The family of convicted child endangerer, Monsignor William Lynn, now
say, in pertinent part, reportedly that Lynn’s criminal trial was about
” … charging an underling with the crimes of his former superiors who could not or would not be prosecuted.”
Lynn must have confirmed this with his family, no? How else could they otherwise have known of the “crimes of his former superiors”, principally Philadelphia Cardinals Justin Rigali and Anthony Bevilacqua. For years Lynn has avoided pointing the fingers at his bosses. At his sentencing, the trial judge told him, in effect, that he should have stood up to the cardinals.
http://christiancatholicism.com/big-news-guilty-monsignors-family-lay-crimes-against-children-on-cardinals-will-pope-now-act-on-rigali/
Lynn must have confirmed this with his family, no? How else could they otherwise have known of the “crimes of his former superiors”, principally Philadelphia Cardinals Justin Rigali and Anthony Bevilacqua. For years Lynn has avoided pointing the fingers at his bosses. At his sentencing, the trial judge told him, in effect, that he should have stood up to the cardinals.
http://christiancatholicism.com/big-news-guilty-monsignors-family-lay-crimes-against-children-on-cardinals-will-pope-now-act-on-rigali/