nuns and women rape children... until we all brake our silence... this
crime will go on... children are innocent of this crime... which is
force onto the children... who have no voice... because no one will
believe them... when they tell of the rape... which these women and nuns
did... just because a women raped a child.. .dose not . give the courts
the right... to set her free of her crime... she did the crime of
rape... and she should do the time... as the men have to... women who
rape children... boys and girls alike... need to serve their time in
jail also... rape of children by any person is a crime...raped of
children by males or females is a crime... Ann
=============================
There is nothing new in a victim of a sexual assault being blamed for the offence. Back in 1982
there was a national outcry when a convicted rapist was punished with
just a £2,000 fine after the judge ruled that his victim, by
hitch-hiking in a skirt, was “guilty of a great deal of contributory
negligence”.At least things have moved on, or so one might have thought. Yesterday, 21-year-old Jade Hatt walked out of court with a suspended sentence after being convicted of unlawful sexual activity with a child. The leniency was explained in part by mitigating testimony that the victim was “sex mad” and ‘“fully up for the experience”. The encounter was a “notch on his belt” and he was “totally unaffected by it”. The victim was just 11 years old. As if that were not sufficiently horrific, that testimony was provided by the boy’s own father, who had himself been in a previous sexual relationship with the defendant.