No he was not lucky... it just proves that he knew all along... of
knowing the the priest were raping innocent children... boys and girls
alike... this man... does not know how to tell the TRUTH... [Had Pell made a big fuss about the abuse going on all around him as a
young priest, he would not be at the Vatican. But as he told the royal
commission, he stayed clear of such ‘sad stories’] this says it all... all that he was interested in... was in Pell himself... Ann
Big things were expected of him back in Australia. He expected big things of himself. But for the next 25 years he found himself serving bishops whose record of handling paedophile priests was (in Ballarat) appalling and (in Melbourne) seriously flawed.
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/mar/01/george-pell-wasnt-much-interested-in-stories-of-abuse-by-priests-which-was-lucky-for-his-career
===================================
Here’s my theory. George Pell
returned to Ballarat as a young priest with big plans. And why not?
He’d gone from Rome to Oxford, where he reckons he was the first
Catholic priest to earn a doctorate of philosophy since the Reformation.Big things were expected of him back in Australia. He expected big things of himself. But for the next 25 years he found himself serving bishops whose record of handling paedophile priests was (in Ballarat) appalling and (in Melbourne) seriously flawed.
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/mar/01/george-pell-wasnt-much-interested-in-stories-of-abuse-by-priests-which-was-lucky-for-his-career